All-in-one HR platform · v2.0
14-day free trial · No credit cardhello@HrMagix.com
Cascading OKRs is the work of making sure that what each team commits to this quarter adds up to what the company said it would do. Done badly, it becomes a copying exercise: the company's key result is pasted into every team's objective, nobody owns anything, and the review at the end of the quarter cannot say who moved what.
This guide is the alignment procedure. It assumes you know what an objective and a key result are; if not, start with the OKRs topic page. For how OKRs differ from KRAs and which to use where, see the KRA vs OKR comparison.
01
Start at the top with a short list of company objectives for the period, each with its key results. Keep the list short enough that a team lead can hold it in their head. A long company list gives every team permission to work on anything.
Write a sentence of context under each objective: why it matters now and what the leadership team is choosing not to do. Teams use that context more than the wording of the key results when they decide how to contribute.
02
Share the company OKRs and ask each team to draft its own: which company objective does the team move, and what result in the team's own work would show it. A team's key result is often a lever under a company key result, not a slice of it. If the company key result is about customer retention, the support team's key result might be about first-response quality, which is theirs to move.
Not every team OKR has to link to a company objective. Some work keeps the lights on or builds capability for later. Allow a small amount of unlinked work and label it clearly, rather than forcing a weak link.
Watch for itCopying the company key result into three teams' OKRs feels aligned but removes ownership. When the number moves, or does not, nobody can say whose work made the difference.
03
Once drafts are in, put all team OKRs side by side against the company list in one session with the team leads. Look for gaps (a company objective no team is moving), overlaps (two teams claiming the same lever) and dependencies (a team whose key result needs another team's help).
Resolve dependencies in the room. If marketing's key result needs product to ship something, product either takes that on as its own key result or marketing changes its key result. A dependency nobody has agreed to is a common reason a team misses.
04
Individual OKRs are optional. They help where a person owns a distinct outcome, such as a specialist or a single-person function. In a team that works together on shared key results, individual OKRs tend to become task lists and add review overhead without adding alignment.
If you use them, keep them to one or two objectives that link to the team's OKRs, and keep them separate from the person's KRAs and appraisal rating. OKRs work best as stretch commitments; tying them directly to ratings encourages people to set targets they know they will hit.
05
Set a regular check-in schedule where each owner updates progress and confidence on their key results. The useful question in a check-in is not the number but whether the team is still working on the right thing given what has changed.
If a company objective changes mid-quarter, re-run a short version of the alignment review for the affected teams rather than leaving their OKRs pointing at something that no longer matters. At the end of the quarter, score key results, write down what was learned, and carry that into the next set. HRMagix includes an OKRs module for setting and tracking objectives and key results, if you want them in the same system as the rest of performance.
Every guide ends here rather than in a summary. If a line below is not true yet, that is the next thing to do.
Linking OKRs at company, team and sometimes individual level so that each team's objectives visibly contribute to the company's. Good cascading has teams write their own contributing OKRs rather than copying the company's key results.
Most should, but not all. Some essential work maintains operations or builds capability. Mark it as team-only rather than forcing a weak link to a company objective.
Not necessarily. They help where a person owns a distinct outcome. In teams working on shared key results they often turn into task lists. If used, keep them few and separate from appraisal ratings.
Agree it explicitly during the alignment review. Either the other team takes on a supporting key result of its own, or the dependent team changes its key result to something it can move.
The checklist above is generic by necessity. Bring your own structures, states and rota and we will tell you which lines are already true and which are not.
14-day free trial · Full access to all 12 modules · Zero implementation fee · Cancel anytime