Loading page
All-in-one HR platform · v2.0
14-day free trial · No credit cardhello@HrMagix.com
All-in-one HR platform · v2.0
14-day free trial · No credit cardhello@HrMagix.com
The administrative charge the employer pays to the EPFO on top of contributions, at 0.5% of PF wages, remitted through the same monthly challan. It is an employer cost only and never deducted from the employee, so it belongs in CTC and payroll cost workings rather than on the payslip.
Admin charges are mostly a matter for the payroll cost budget and the monthly challan. When the ECR is uploaded, the portal calculates the charge on the establishment's total PF wages, and payroll checks that figure against its own working before paying.
As an example, an establishment with 40 members each on PF wages of ₹15,000 has total PF wages of ₹6,00,000, and the 0.5% charge is ₹3,000. A small establishment with total PF wages of ₹60,000 would work out at ₹300 but pays the ₹500 minimum per establishment per month.
Two practical points follow. When budgeting cost per employee for a small team, the minimum charge makes the per-head cost higher than 0.5% suggests. And when finance compares the challan with payroll, a difference is often the minimum charge or arrears in a month, not an error in member contributions.
0.5% of PF wages, paid by the employer on top of its 12% contribution. Payroll should include it in the employer's PF cost, not deduct it from the employee.
They are charged on the PF wages actually used for contributions, so if the employer contributes on wages above ₹15,000 the charge is calculated on that higher amount.
Yes, a minimum monthly amount applies per establishment. Check the current EPFO notification for the figure.
Many companies include them in CTC as part of the employer's PF cost. Whatever the choice, it should be applied consistently and explained in offer letters.
14-day free trial · Full access to all 12 modules · Zero implementation fee · Cancel anytime